After much discussion about the disaster in Gaza and the suffering of the civilian population, the court in The Hague issued an interim decision. Israel is obliged to take all possible measures not to violate the Genocide Convention, to ensure its observance and to bring to justice those responsible for its violation. In addition, Israel must preserve all evidence and ensure the delivery of humanitarian aid.
According to the Court’s decision, Israel must take the following actions:
The Court acknowledges the context: On October 7, Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 people and capturing many more. In response, Israel launched a military operation that created a difficult humanitarian situation in the enclave.
The court’s decision was met with mixed reactions. Israel called the decision an “important legal victory,” while South Africa welcomed the decision, although not all of its demands were met.
Senior Israeli sources described the decision by the International Court of Justice in The Hague as “an important legal victory for Israel and a major blow to Hamas. They explained that the court “did not dare to take away our right to defend ourselves. As for the warning about calls for genocide by some Israelis, the Israeli government’s legal adviser is already dealing with this issue without the International Court of Justice’s urging. As for the humanitarian aid that the court demanded be provided to the Gaza Strip, Israel is already trying to increase it, because thanks to it we have been fighting quietly for 3.5 months, the sources explained.
Israel categorically denies all the charges brought against it in The Hague. Israeli lawyers told the court that from the very beginning the Israeli military took into account the importance of preserving the lives of the civilian population in Gaza, for example by giving all civilians and non-combatants two weeks to leave the northern part of the sector before launching military operation Iron Swords there. They also say that after initially stopping the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza at the beginning of the war, Israel later allowed it to continue on a daily basis.
In addition, the Israeli legal team at the International Court of Justice recalled that some cruel and inflammatory statements by a number of Israeli politicians, actually made in the first days after the attack by Hamas militants on October 7, were made by people who have no legislative or executive authority, or were taken out of context. More than 30 orders from the Israeli government and IDF leadership were declassified, which the lawyers said showed Israel’s efforts to minimize harm to civilians in the sector.
Among the declassified documents is a summary of a series of discussions in the Israeli Cabinet at the end of October last year, in which Prime Minister Netanyahu ordered the delivery of aid, fuel and water to Gaza. He also instructed his government to explore how “third countries” could set up field hospitals to treat Gaza residents, as well as to consider docking a large hospital ship off the coast of Gaza.
But this dossier, according to critics, was of course carefully edited. It does not mention most of the military instructions and orders given by the Cabinet and the IDF leadership in the first 10 days after the Hamas attack on Israel, when in response all aid to the residents of Gaza was completely blocked, starting with access to the electricity and water that Israel normally supplies there.
The decisions of the International Court of Justice (often confused with the International Criminal Court in The Hague), the highest judicial body of the United Nations, are binding. At the same time, this court has very few means of enforcing its decisions. Nevertheless, the ruling could increase international pressure on the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the war in Gaza.
The situation in the region remains tense and a peaceful solution to the conflict seems increasingly difficult.
It is important to remember that every life matters, and every action taken in response to violence must be aimed at protecting the innocent and ensuring peace and stability.
The UN agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA has issued a statement according to which the organization has launched an investigation against its employees who participated in the October 7 terrorist attack or engaged in direct incitement to it. At the moment, dozens of such cases are known, and even thousands if we talk about incitement and justification of the terrorist attack.
The statement itself was issued after the UN International Court of Justice ruling on provisional measures against Israel. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that the timing had to do with the fact that the organization didn’t want to give the court an argument against the South African accusation.
As a first reaction to the organization’s announcement, the US is cutting off funding to the entity. Hopefully, other countries will follow suit.
This post was last modified on January 26, 2024 20:03
Stephen L. Carter, a law professor at Yale University, asked his students a simple question: what country do the Palestinians… Read More
Why do they want to kill the Saudi prince? Last week, Politico magazine published an article describing a conversation between… Read More
The survival of 100,000 Palestinians in Egypt without refugee status After the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023,… Read More
Hezbollah’s internal enemies. Part one. Muslims. After Saturday's attack on the Israeli town of Majdal Shams, official Hezbollah leaders immediately… Read More
October 7, 2023, was a day for Israel that turned a page in history. The country lost not only 1,400… Read More
O Hassan Nasrallah.. Know so you don't have to tell me if I knew! Lebanese Shiite cleric Mohamad Ali El… Read More
